Tuesday, October 9, 2007

The Art of Photomanipulation

Although you will constantly hear photographers scold and nag about the photomanipulation process, it is actually one that has been used for many years, and one which is able to offer a variety of benefits. It has also existed throughout the art of photography in many different forms, including everything from different angles, how to use different lights and settings, hiding imperfections, and so on.

Especially in the world we live in today, where everything and everyone is expected to be perfect, namely in the magazines that stare back at us from off the shelves, photo manipulation has played an incredibly large role.

What is it?

Photomanipulation is basically the art of taking a normal photograph and then manipulating it the way that you want it, namely through use of a computer and various tools and applications on the computer. This modifies photographs either by analog or digital means, and is also commonly referred or related to what is known as 'Photoshopping', which is the slang term for the digital editing them, and although it is not directly aimed at the Adobe Photoshop application, it was named after it. Adobe Photoshop is only one of the many different digital editing applications that are available however, and for instance there is Paint Shop Pro, Corel, and even Paint, although this is one of the less advanced programs and is rarely used in the photomanipulation processes of today.

Ethics

There has been a lot of controversy surrounding the issue of photomanipulation, and although there are definitely many people who have good, positive things to say about it, there are also those who feel that there are concerning issues surrounding it. For instance on the covers of magazines, when celebrities heads are pasted onto different bodies, this in the past has stirred up a lot of commotion. One instance in particular was when the O.J. Simpson trial was taking place and the Newsweek magazine posted his mug shot as their magazine cover picture, while Time Magazine posted the exact same picture only used photomanipulation to alter it, and ended up making Simpson appear much darker than he was in the actual picture, and as well they removed the serial number and darkened the area around him. The Lebanon reuters incidents is just another prime example.

The ironic part was that the magazines ended up side by side on a newsstand, and it was incredibly clear what a significant amount of this had taken place in Time's version of the photograph.

Journalism is only one area that uses a great deal of photomanipulation, and fashion magazines are definitely topping the list as well. One of the biggest problems with these photomanipulated photographs is that they alter the opinions and views of the public who, for the majority of the time, have no clue that the particular photo was even altered at all. Therefore there really needs to be certain standards set in the field of photography when it comes to something such as photomanipulation.

Domen Lombergar uses photomanipulation to create his limited edition prints and windows vista wallpapers, come check them out!
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Domen_Lombergar

Personal Note: Although it is not directly related to photography you can say. But What a great artist Mr. Domen Lombergar is. I request you all to take a look at his website.

Labels:

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you, I really appreciate it, my friend. Have a beautiful day!

October 10, 2007 at 5:01 AM  
Blogger AZRainman said...

More legislation?...bah humbug!

I disagree in having set standards that censor artistic freedom of expression, whereas photo-manipulation is a form of art. I refuse to have my brushes tethered by bureaucracy and/or a corporatocracy that pretends to be a moral authority, while it steals away my liberties and resources.

As for news outlets who portray photo-manipulated elements as factual, let the readers decide...when their subscriptions plummet, they will get a clue or can reclassify themselves as a comic book.

So who's standards do I want imposed on me or to define on how I should see the world? Do we have a divine council of holy truth advisers of the new 4th Reich, who see and know all? Will they burn books and label art as degenerate too, because it isn't realistic enough? Where does the censor insanity stop, once you let that control genie out? Standards for you perhaps, but I will decide for myself on what is reality and what is not.

Now here's a OJ Vegas Photo for ya.

Be careful what you wish for, you may find you have built the walls of your own standardized prison cell.

AZRainman : Photoshop Satire

October 18, 2007 at 12:27 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home